Comments on: Whatever Happened to the Anointing on William Branham? http://www.revivalblog.com/whatever-happened-to-the-anointing-on-william-branham/ Didn't our hearts burn within us? Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:54:09 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Christopher http://www.revivalblog.com/whatever-happened-to-the-anointing-on-william-branham/comment-page-1/#comment-22891 Christopher Mon, 15 Feb 2010 04:33:38 +0000 http://www.revivalblog.com/2008/03/28/whatever-happened-to-the-anointing-on-william-branham/#comment-22891 Shalom, Brothers and sister, I want to say this, reasoning goes against faith. Unto those who are criticizing brother Branham, let me ask you a question. "Is salvation by grace or knowledge". Show me a 100% percent man and I will tell you it is Jesus Christ and no one else. Moses spoke with God from mouth to mouth yet later disobeys God. Brethren, This is not the time to be critics, let move by the spirit of the message. A brother said brother Branham was to unite all the churches, first of all, if brother Branham did not condermn denomination and speak again the catholic blindness, he will not be qualified to fufil the ministry of Elijah of which he did. Ecunemism is anti word, repent and come out from her. Rev 18. Brother Branham is the voice crying behold the bridegroom cometh. Unto some,(the few wise,) they have their lights trimed and fedding on the revealed word. Supping with the Word groom, but unto the foolish virgins, their confusion left them no option but run through darkness to buy and oil (Holy Ghost). No wonder, God will tell them I don't Know you; simply because they did not have any intimacy with the word groom. Brother Branham, taught Acts 2:38 which is that said the Lord, the only baptism in the scripture. If you get there and receive the Holy Spirit, that is the earnest of your salvation. He the Holy Spirit will then lead your to all truth, and all you need to know to keep you healthy in Christ Jesus. Brother Branham pointed us to Christ, behold the bridegroom cometh, after that, his work is done. Follow the spirit of the message and let the Lord lead you. You can reach me at cblay@live.com if you have any questions, you can also join me at http://scriptureunion.groupsite.com God bless you all. Hope to see you at the groupsite to discuss more about brother Branham. Shalom,

Brothers and sister, I want to say this, reasoning goes against faith. Unto those who are criticizing brother Branham, let me ask you a question. “Is salvation by grace or knowledge”. Show me a 100% percent man and I will tell you it is Jesus Christ and no one else. Moses spoke with God from mouth to mouth yet later disobeys God. Brethren, This is not the time to be critics, let move by the spirit of the message.

A brother said brother Branham was to unite all the churches, first of all, if brother Branham did not condermn denomination and speak again the catholic blindness, he will not be qualified to fufil the ministry of Elijah of which he did. Ecunemism is anti word, repent and come out from her. Rev 18.

Brother Branham is the voice crying behold the bridegroom cometh. Unto some,(the few wise,) they have their lights trimed and fedding on the revealed word. Supping with the Word groom, but unto the foolish virgins, their confusion left them no option but run through darkness to buy and oil (Holy Ghost). No wonder, God will tell them I don’t Know you; simply because they did not have any intimacy with the word groom.

Brother Branham, taught Acts 2:38 which is that said the Lord, the only baptism in the scripture. If you get there and receive the Holy Spirit, that is the earnest of your salvation. He the Holy Spirit will then lead your to all truth, and all you need to know to keep you healthy in Christ Jesus. Brother Branham pointed us to Christ, behold the bridegroom cometh, after that, his work is done.

Follow the spirit of the message and let the Lord lead you. You can reach me at cblay@live.com if you have any questions, you can also join me at
http://scriptureunion.groupsite.com

God bless you all. Hope to see you at the groupsite to discuss more about brother Branham.

]]> By: Eugene Raby http://www.revivalblog.com/whatever-happened-to-the-anointing-on-william-branham/comment-page-1/#comment-22888 Eugene Raby Tue, 09 Feb 2010 13:51:15 +0000 http://www.revivalblog.com/2008/03/28/whatever-happened-to-the-anointing-on-william-branham/#comment-22888 Amen, Brother Simon He is the messanger for this church age. He is the forerunner Jesus Christ is comming. Many people say he brought something new, as he stated I preached what Paul preached. He was a restoring prophet nothing new but tied up all the lose ends. Thru christ revealed all the mystreies. Count yourself blessed Brother Simon for it is not ment for all to see. GOD bless you all Amen, Brother Simon He is the messanger for this church age. He is the forerunner Jesus Christ is comming. Many people say he brought something new, as he stated I preached what Paul preached. He was a restoring prophet nothing new but tied up all the lose ends. Thru christ revealed all the mystreies. Count yourself blessed Brother Simon for it is not ment for all to see. GOD bless you all

]]> By: Christian http://www.revivalblog.com/whatever-happened-to-the-anointing-on-william-branham/comment-page-1/#comment-22887 Christian Tue, 09 Feb 2010 08:11:14 +0000 http://www.revivalblog.com/2008/03/28/whatever-happened-to-the-anointing-on-william-branham/#comment-22887 Fellow brethren, I am Bro. Simon from Kenya, E. Africa. I have read through these comments with fear in my heart. Fear because of the way that men would talk about God's messengers. One thing I have noted is a propensity by certain individuals to look for errors in Bro. Branham's teachings. I choose to look at it differently - what about his teachings was right? And If he really was wrong, let us not show disrespect [it isn't Christian to begin with - remember the speck in your bro's eye?], instead show us who is the real Malachi 4:5 who never made any mistake. If you can't show me who is the forerunner of Christ's second coming, I don't see why you should show disrespect to Bro. Branham. Please pardon me if those words hurt you. I'd like to mention something else. Moses [a prophet even to Muslims] at one time married a non-Jew against God's Word. Miriam and Aaron spoke against him [and their accusation was absolutely right]. God summoned them, gave them a lecture and Miriam left the presence of God a leper. Aaron's sons started dying years later. Moral of the story: "touch not my anointed" no matter what. At Bro. Branham's memorial service, Tommy Osborn, himself not a "Branhamite" talked of Jesus walking the streets of Phoenix in the man called William Branham. You can listen to his speech here: http://www.vrijezending.nl/docs/osborn1.htm My parting question to everyone of us, myself included is: Do people see Christ in you as you go about your daily business? Do they confuse you with Christ because of the life that you live? Would Christ speak like we are doing, of His Father's servants? If you must know, many people mistook William Marrion Branham for Jesus Christ because of the fruits that he bore. It shows me that he was grafted to the True Vine. Examine your own attitudes and words and judge for yourself - what fruits are you bringing forth? God bless you all. Fellow brethren,

I am Bro. Simon from Kenya, E. Africa. I have read through these comments with fear in my heart. Fear because of the way that men would talk about God’s messengers. One thing I have noted is a propensity by certain individuals to look for errors in Bro. Branham’s teachings. I choose to look at it differently – what about his teachings was right? And If he really was wrong, let us not show disrespect [it isn't Christian to begin with - remember the speck in your bro's eye?], instead show us who is the real Malachi 4:5 who never made any mistake. If you can’t show me who is the forerunner of Christ’s second coming, I don’t see why you should show disrespect to Bro. Branham. Please pardon me if those words hurt you.
I’d like to mention something else. Moses [a prophet even to Muslims] at one time married a non-Jew against God’s Word. Miriam and Aaron spoke against him [and their accusation was absolutely right]. God summoned them, gave them a lecture and Miriam left the presence of God a leper. Aaron’s sons started dying years later. Moral of the story: “touch not my anointed” no matter what. At Bro. Branham’s memorial service, Tommy Osborn, himself not a “Branhamite” talked of Jesus walking the streets of Phoenix in the man called William Branham. You can listen to his speech here: http://www.vrijezending.nl/docs/osborn1.htm
My parting question to everyone of us, myself included is: Do people see Christ in you as you go about your daily business? Do they confuse you with Christ because of the life that you live? Would Christ speak like we are doing, of His Father’s servants? If you must know, many people mistook William Marrion Branham for Jesus Christ because of the fruits that he bore. It shows me that he was grafted to the True Vine. Examine your own attitudes and words and judge for yourself – what fruits are you bringing forth?

God bless you all.

]]> By: Deborah http://www.revivalblog.com/whatever-happened-to-the-anointing-on-william-branham/comment-page-1/#comment-22884 Deborah Sat, 23 Jan 2010 21:40:10 +0000 http://www.revivalblog.com/2008/03/28/whatever-happened-to-the-anointing-on-william-branham/#comment-22884 Yeshua said the only reason was "except for fornication", which may have meant intercourse with another man before marriage, or during the betrothal period (when she could be put away for that also), or perhaps even finding out after the marriage that the woman had been unfaithful and lied about her purity. If the man divorces the woman, he can not remarry or he is committing adultery. Neither can she. According to Yeshua, not William Branham. Yeshua said the only reason was “except for fornication”, which may have meant intercourse with another man before marriage, or during the betrothal period (when she could be put away for that also), or perhaps even finding out after the marriage that the woman had been unfaithful and lied about her purity. If the man divorces the woman, he can not remarry or he is committing adultery. Neither can she. According to Yeshua, not William Branham.

]]> By: Christopher Dresbach http://www.revivalblog.com/whatever-happened-to-the-anointing-on-william-branham/comment-page-1/#comment-22882 Christopher Dresbach Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:46:37 +0000 http://www.revivalblog.com/2008/03/28/whatever-happened-to-the-anointing-on-william-branham/#comment-22882 Jesus said that a man is only to divorce a woman if she commits adultery. That's the best I can give from the Word. I must continue to follow the Word and what it says. I am aware that her hair is her covering and her glory, but this does not appear in any way to tie in with a reason for divorce. Jesus said that a man is only to divorce a woman if she commits adultery. That’s the best I can give from the Word. I must continue to follow the Word and what it says. I am aware that her hair is her covering and her glory, but this does not appear in any way to tie in with a reason for divorce.

]]> By: Eugene Raby http://www.revivalblog.com/whatever-happened-to-the-anointing-on-william-branham/comment-page-1/#comment-22881 Eugene Raby Tue, 19 Jan 2010 02:56:12 +0000 http://www.revivalblog.com/2008/03/28/whatever-happened-to-the-anointing-on-william-branham/#comment-22881 Amen Amen

]]> By: B.W. http://www.revivalblog.com/whatever-happened-to-the-anointing-on-william-branham/comment-page-1/#comment-22880 B.W. Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:36:37 +0000 http://www.revivalblog.com/2008/03/28/whatever-happened-to-the-anointing-on-william-branham/#comment-22880 Carl, a generation is not the mathematical 30 years as we are taught in school. If you have a chance to read "Church Ages" by Brother Branham, it will give you the generational dispensations as stated in the book of Revelations. It is in the Last church age "Laodicea" that both you and I fall into, with a whole group of people from about 1906 thereabout. If this was my forum, I would explain the types as explained in the book of Revelations. Now let me add and say that.. If Brother Branham had taught anything other than that, which is already in the bible.. then Paul says Galatians 1:8 "..let him be accursed.." To those that remember the quote from Bro Branham "I preached what Paul Preached" God never changes his standard…no not ever. If The creator of the universe himself, overcame by his own word spoken through his prophets when he was tempted.. he will not suffer us to teach from our own understanding.. but ONLY from the word of God. All things that Brother Branham taught including his so called “false doctrines” strangely enough are ALL..EVERY ONE OF THEM..100% from the bible you have. I challenge you to sturdy the scriptures and compare his teachings with the bible like I have since 1976. Carl, a generation is not the mathematical 30 years as we are taught in school. If you have a chance to read “Church Ages” by Brother Branham, it will give you the generational dispensations as stated in the book of Revelations. It is in the Last church age “Laodicea” that both you and I fall into, with a whole group of people from about 1906 thereabout. If this was my forum, I would explain the types as explained in the book of Revelations.

Now let me add and say that.. If Brother Branham had taught anything other than that, which is already in the bible.. then Paul says Galatians 1:8 “..let him be accursed..”

To those that remember the quote from Bro Branham “I preached what Paul Preached” God never changes his standard…no not ever. If The creator of the universe himself, overcame by his own word spoken through his prophets when he was tempted.. he will not suffer us to teach from our own understanding.. but ONLY from the word of God. All things that Brother Branham taught including his so called “false doctrines” strangely enough are ALL..EVERY ONE OF THEM..100% from the bible you have.

I challenge you to sturdy the scriptures and compare his teachings with the bible like I have since 1976.

]]> By: Eugene Raby http://www.revivalblog.com/whatever-happened-to-the-anointing-on-william-branham/comment-page-1/#comment-22879 Eugene Raby Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:52:05 +0000 http://www.revivalblog.com/2008/03/28/whatever-happened-to-the-anointing-on-william-branham/#comment-22879 Yes, I agree you can take his message and make it say what you want to by putting quotes where they don't belong. And yes he made mistakes, Brother Branham walked in the progression of light as Christ reveled it to him. I do not understand abuot cutting hair, it does say her hair is her glory / covering ( which short hair could not be used as a covering). I do know that if my wife cut her hair I would be hurt being that I think my wife is beautifull wit long hair however I would not divorce her for it. I did put the book of Ester as an example of a man putting his wife away. Agian I don't understand maybe she was scared to get in front of the people but it is in the bible. I do believe he made mistakes but as a common man besides taking it back to the bible I have to re lie on my pastor. We know what Brother Branham says about hair. We know that the bible says. Yes, he made mistake's if he was the prophet ( I believe he was ) how do you make the the choice. Do you take his word or do you make your own interpretation and hope your right. Rember as long as Jesus was doing the fishes and loafs people where happy but when he started preaching doctrian changing from what they where used to they did not agree some wanted to kill him other just left. So my question (to all) with out God leading you how do you with out doubt say what is ment by a woman hair is her glory / covering. I just want to know. God bless you all. Yes, I agree you can take his message and make it say what you want to by putting quotes where they don’t belong. And yes he made mistakes, Brother Branham walked in the progression of light as Christ reveled it to him. I do not understand abuot cutting hair, it does say her hair is her glory / covering ( which short hair could not be used as a covering). I do know that if my wife cut her hair I would be hurt being that I think my wife is beautifull wit long hair however I would not divorce her for it. I did put the book of Ester as an example of a man putting his wife away. Agian I don’t understand maybe she was scared to get in front of the people but it is in the bible. I do believe he made mistakes but as a common man besides taking it back to the bible I have to re lie on my pastor. We know what Brother Branham says about hair. We know that the bible says. Yes, he made mistake’s if he was the prophet ( I believe he was ) how do you make the the choice. Do you take his word or do you make your own interpretation and hope your right. Rember as long as Jesus was doing the fishes and loafs people where happy but when he started preaching doctrian changing from what they where used to they did not agree some wanted to kill him other just left. So my question (to all) with out God leading you how do you with out doubt say what is ment by a woman hair is her glory / covering. I just want to know. God bless you all.

]]> By: Christopher Dresbach http://www.revivalblog.com/whatever-happened-to-the-anointing-on-william-branham/comment-page-1/#comment-22878 Christopher Dresbach Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:20:11 +0000 http://www.revivalblog.com/2008/03/28/whatever-happened-to-the-anointing-on-william-branham/#comment-22878 Although Brother Branham himself admitted that he made mistakes, many people treat it as a stumblingblock or criticism for anyone today to state that he made mistakes although we can say that Peter, Paul, John, Old Testament prophets, etc, made mistakes and mention what they were without being said to criticize these men of God. Whether one believes William Branham to be the final Church Age messenger or not, it should be accepted that NO MAN is perfect and NO MAN is THE WORD OF GOD. Did he not teach the Seals and Church Ages differently in his earlier years of ministry? And is there any simple Biblical proof that a man can divorce his wife for cutting her hair? I have had one example provided in the book of Esther and an explanation that a woman cutting her hair is a sign of adultery, but these do not show that a man can by the Word divorce her for cutting her hair. I neither criticize nor blaspheme here. I simply state facts. God bless all who read this. Although Brother Branham himself admitted that he made mistakes, many people treat it as a stumblingblock or criticism for anyone today to state that he made mistakes although we can say that Peter, Paul, John, Old Testament prophets, etc, made mistakes and mention what they were without being said to criticize these men of God. Whether one believes William Branham to be the final Church Age messenger or not, it should be accepted that NO MAN is perfect and NO MAN is THE WORD OF GOD. Did he not teach the Seals and Church Ages differently in his earlier years of ministry? And is there any simple Biblical proof that a man can divorce his wife for cutting her hair? I have had one example provided in the book of Esther and an explanation that a woman cutting her hair is a sign of adultery, but these do not show that a man can by the Word divorce her for cutting her hair. I neither criticize nor blaspheme here. I simply state facts. God bless all who read this.

]]> By: Eugene Raby http://www.revivalblog.com/whatever-happened-to-the-anointing-on-william-branham/comment-page-1/#comment-22877 Eugene Raby Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:18:25 +0000 http://www.revivalblog.com/2008/03/28/whatever-happened-to-the-anointing-on-william-branham/#comment-22877 Brother Buford, I don't believe the messages are dead no more than the messages are dead from all the other prophets of old. I do believe that we need God fearing, Bible studying pastors etc... to bring it up to date for our day. Exampel if Brother Branham was here he would blast the compter more than the tv myself I believe theirs good on both. I think he was a restoring Prophet, did not bring nothing new but tied up lose ends. As he said I preached what paul preached and I don't believe Paul's message is dead. God bless all, Eugene Brother Buford, I don’t believe the messages are dead no more than the messages are dead from all the other prophets of old. I do believe that we need God fearing, Bible studying pastors etc… to bring it up to date for our day. Exampel if Brother Branham was here he would blast the compter more than the tv myself I believe theirs good on both. I think he was a restoring Prophet, did not bring nothing new but tied up lose ends. As he said I preached what paul preached and I don’t believe Paul’s message is dead. God bless all, Eugene

]]>